@craft-ng/core

Appearance

Form exception handling ​

Form validation exceptions are typed UI obligations. A component must handle every reachable exception in its template or forward the remaining cases to a component boundary before it can be rendered, mounted, or used by a route.

Read this when you render validation messages, split them between several locations, or validate a group of fields.

Reading exceptions as values ​

Validators do not throw. They keep the field and form invalid and expose their exceptions as signals:

ts
const email = loginForm.form.selectEmail();

email.errors();
email.exceptions().list;
email.exceptions().byValidator.cRequired;
email.firstLeftFailedValidation();
email.lastRightFailedValidation();

Handling an exception only renders its message. It does not remove the exception or make the field valid.

Case 1: handle every exception beside one field ​

CraftFieldDirective carries the field's exact validator cases onto the VNode. An exhaustive block must provide exactly one handler for every reachable code:

ts
input({ id: 'email', type: 'email' })
  .pipe(CraftFieldDirective(loginForm.form.selectEmail()))
  .pipe(
    fieldExceptionBlock.exhaustive({
      required: () => p('Email is required.'),
      email: () => p('Enter a valid email.'),
    }),
  );

A missing handler and an unreachable extra handler are both TypeScript errors.

Case 2: handle only some exceptions locally ​

Use partial when an exception belongs beside the control while the remaining cases should continue to an enclosing boundary:

ts
input({ id: 'password', type: 'password' })
  .pipe(CraftFieldDirective(loginForm.form.selectPassword()))
  .pipe(
    fieldExceptionBlock.partial({
      required: () => p('Password is required.'),
    }),
  );

If the field also declares minLength, that case remains in the component's contract until another partial or exhaustive block handles it.

Case 3: handle several fields at a component boundary ​

At a boundary that receives more than one field path, group handlers by their static path. Identical codes on different fields remain separate obligations:

ts
const SafeLoginForm = BaseLoginForm.pipe(
  fieldExceptionBlock.exhaustive({
    email: {
      required: () => p('Email is required.'),
      email: () => p('Enter a valid email.'),
    },
    password: {
      required: () => p('Password is required.'),
      minLength: ({ exception }) =>
        p(`Use at least ${exception.payload} characters.`),
    },
  }),
);

Case 4: handle a group or cross-field validator ​

A group validator is declared on an object branch rather than on one leaf control. Materialize that branch in the component logic and return it from the factory:

ts
function* registrationLogic() {
  const registration = yield* state(
    'registration',
    {
      credentials: {
        password: '',
        confirmation: '',
      },
    },
    insertForm(
      insertSelectFormTree(
        'credentials',
        insertNoopTypingAnchor,
        insertFormAttributes(({ field }) => ({
          validators: [
            cValidate({
              name: 'passwordsMatch',
              validWhen: () =>
                field.value().password === field.value().confirmation,
              exception: () =>
                craftException({ code: 'passwordMismatch' }, undefined),
            }),
          ],
        })),
      ),
    ),
  );

  const credentials = registration.form.selectCredentials();
  return { registration, credentials };
}

The component logic now declares the typed obligation credentials.passwordMismatch. The group itself does not need a CraftFieldDirective; only its leaf controls need their usual DOM bindings.

Handle the group in the template ​

A grouped handler on an enclosing VNode consumes the logic-level obligation:

ts
({ credentials }) =>
  div([
    input({ type: 'password' }).pipe(CraftFieldDirective(credentials.password)),
    input({ type: 'password' }).pipe(
      CraftFieldDirective(credentials.confirmation),
    ),
  ]).pipe(
    fieldExceptionBlock.exhaustive({
      credentials: {
        passwordMismatch: () => p('Passwords do not match.'),
      },
    }),
  );

The exception source is registered from the component logic, independently of a DOM binding for the group.

Forward the group to the component boundary ​

The template may leave the group case unresolved and let the component boundary handle it:

ts
const SafeRegistrationForm = BaseRegistrationForm.pipe(
  fieldExceptionBlock.exhaustive({
    credentials: {
      passwordMismatch: () => p('Passwords do not match.'),
    },
  }),
);

If neither location handles it, using the component is a compile-time error:

ts
// TypeScript error: credentials.passwordMismatch remains unhandled.
loadCraftComponent(async () => BaseRegistrationForm);

Visibility: blur and submit ​

By default, a block consumes visibleExceptions. A validation exception is visible when its field or group is touched, or after a submit attempt:

ts
insertFormAttributes(() => ({
  validators: [cRequired()],
  exceptionVisibility: { anyOf: ['touched', 'submitted'] },
}));

After a blur, only the touched field and its parent groups reveal their remaining exceptions. A submit attempt reveals every remaining exception in the form. Resetting the form clears dirty, touched, and submitted, so the messages become hidden again.

Use visibility: 'always', another anyOf combination, or a predicate to override this policy on one block. mode controls whether the first or all matching exceptions render, and position selects before or after.

Submission and schema exceptions ​

insertFormSubmit exposes submission exceptions separately from field validation cases. insertFormSchema projects issues with paths onto matching fields and leaves pathless issues on the form root through schemaExceptions().

See also ​