Integrate AIOpsLab Internship Infrastructure and SC-MVP Documentation - #3
Integrate AIOpsLab Internship Infrastructure and SC-MVP Documentation#3vitrixLab wants to merge 18 commits into
Conversation
# PR: SC-MVP-01 Cluster Setup — Basic Infra Reqs ## Branch `sc-mvp/cluster-setup` ## Commit Message Add BASIC INFRA REQS.md + lightweight logging ## Snippet / ETL-Friendly Description - SC-MVP-01: Provision k3/kind cluster, 1 control-plane + 1 worker node - Namespace `sc-mvp-test` for app deployment - Capture stdout/stderr logs in **CSV/JSON** for SQLite ETL - Record timestamps, pod status, and resource usage - Optional cleanup: delete cluster on failure - Documentation includes `kind-config.yaml` and reproducibility steps - SHA256 (Original Artifact): `<SHA256-ORIGINAL-PLACEHOLDER>` <!-- Replace with local artifact hash --> - SHA256 (Microsoft Official): `<SHA256-MICROSOFT-PLACEHOLDER>` <!-- Replace with official upstream hash --> ## Commit Email vitrixlabph@gmail.com
## SC-MVP-02: Checkpoint Definition — App Deployment & Rollout Verification ### Branch `sc-mvp/app-deploy` ### Commit Message Define app deployment checkpoint with idempotent rollout verification ### Snippet **SC-MVP-02: Deploy Hotel Reservation App** - Deploy **hotel reservation app** into `sc-mvp-test` namespace - Ensure **idempotent deployment** (safe re-apply with no side effects) - Use declarative manifests (Deployment, Service, optional Ingress) - Verify successful rollout via: - `kubectl rollout status` - Pod readiness & availability checks - Service endpoint accessibility - Capture deployment metadata: - Timestamps (apply/start/ready) - Pod status & restart count - Image digest / tag used - Log stdout/stderr and rollout results in **CSV/JSON** (SQLite-ready ETL) - Failure handling: - Automatic rollback or explicit failure state - Preserve logs and cluster state for audit - Documentation includes: - Deployment manifests - Rollout verification steps - Re-run / idempotency validation notes ### Artifact Integrity - **SHA256 (Original Artifact):** `<SHA256-CONTRI-PLACEHOLDER>` - **SHA256 (Microsoft Official):** `<SHA256-MICROSOFT-PLACEHOLDER>` ### Commit Email `vitrixlabph@gmail.com`
Create HOTEL RESERVATION APP MICROSERVICE ARCHITECTURE.md
Create BASIC INFRA REQS.md
Add repository roles and permissions governance document This change introduces a clear, auditable definition of repository access roles to enforce least-privilege access and contributor governance. The document defines: - Read, Triage, and Write roles with explicit permissions - Usage guidance for each role - Governance principles for access control and auditability Purpose: ensure secure, compliant, and traceable access management aligned with AIOpsLab quality and safety standards.
Add repository roles and permissions governance document This change introduces a clear, auditable definition of repository access roles to enforce least-privilege access and contributor governance. The document defines: - Read, Triage, and Write roles with explicit permissions - Usage guidance for each role - Governance principles for access control and auditability Purpose: ensure secure, compliant, and traceable access management aligned with AIOpsLab quality and safety standards.
Add repository roles and permissions governance document This change introduces a clear, auditable definition of repository access roles to enforce least-privilege access and contributor governance. The document defines: - Read, Triage, and Write roles with explicit permissions - Usage guidance for each role - Governance principles for access control and auditability Purpose: ensure secure, compliant, and traceable access management aligned with AIOpsLab quality and safety standards.
LICENSE contributor VitrixLab, VitrixLab Internship Initiative Program and Jason "Soo Ji" Dano | "Peper Cruz" Et.al
adding License contributors: VitrixLab, VitrixLab Internship Initiative Program and Jason "Soo Ji" Dano | "Peper Cruz" Et.al
Proof-of-Work / Recovery Progress UpdateThis comment records the current read-only integration investigation and is intended to make the work auditable for maintainer review. Current PR topologyThe branches are genuinely divergent. The common PR merge base is: The current target has 2 commits not present on the internship branch, while the internship side has 18 source-unique commits. This divergence has been explicitly accepted for maintainer review; no automatic rebase or synchronization has been performed. Mother-repository lineage investigationThe broader lineage was also checked against Relative to the locked upstream baseline, Target-side divergence inspectedThe two commits directly separating current target
These are materially related to the same historical SC-MVP/internship work represented by this PR, rather than being treated as unrelated branch noise. Content/security preflightThe internship changes were inspected for the known governance concerns. The read-only review found:
Synchronization attempt / boundaryA separately authorized synchronization was investigated using a clean-head strategy, but the connected GitHub integration returned: No branch was created, no source Current dispositionPR #3 remains an open historical integration proposal for maintainer review. No merge is being requested or performed. No rebase/synchronization is being performed automatically. The remaining questions are intentionally left to maintainers:
The purpose of this proof-of-work record is to document the investigation and preserve the evidence trail, not to claim that the integration is already merge-ready. Status: Investigation/proof-of-work documented; PR remains open and subject to maintainer review. |
Proof-of-Work: Anticipated Integration Issues / Maintainer ChecklistFollowing the read-only lineage and PR preflight, the recovery work has reached the point where the remaining risks are maintainer integration decisions, not reasons to rewrite the internship source automatically. Anticipated issues to track
Governance boundaryThis comment is a proof-of-work / anticipation record only. It does not authorize rebasing, synchronization, conflict resolution, branch changes, or merge. No target Issue-tracking limitationWe attempted to create a dedicated repository issue for the first integration-risk item, but GitHub reports that Issues are disabled in Recommended disposition: keep PR #3 open for maintainer review and use the checklist above as the integration gate. |
Purpose
This PR proposes integrating the AIOpsLab internship work from:
VitrixLab-Internship-Initiative-Program/AIOpsLabmaina8fe5ed4b81e7df5492c78dd73817c9197d21db1into:
vitrixLab/AIOpsLabmain8b342ba2a34d22b8ec07e49bef56dd5ba2aff2abThe source and target histories are intentionally divergent. The source is 18 commits ahead of the merge base, while the target contains 2 commits not present in the source. This target divergence has been explicitly accepted for maintainer review.
Scope
The proposed integration contains nine changed paths covering:
vitrixlab/documentation;The historical SC-MVP references and duplicate
vitrixlab/documentation/LICENSE files are intentional internship documentation and are included transparently for maintainer review.Security / repository hygiene preflight
Read-only inspection found:
ghcr.io/example/...:latestreference;latestimage reference;The README contains API-key placeholders such as
<YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY>solely as documentation examples; no actual credential values were identified.Historical SC-MVP material
The included documentation references the historical SC-MVP infrastructure/application work, including:
sc-mvp/cluster-setupsc-mvp/app-deployThese references are retained intentionally rather than silently removed, and are submitted for maintainer determination regarding their continued relevance.
Licensing / attribution
The source contains LICENSE material and contributor attribution associated with the internship work. Duplicate license files with differing attribution are intentionally visible in this proposal so maintainers can determine the appropriate canonical licensing/attribution treatment.
Validation state
This PR was preceded by a read-only repository, branch, comparison, commit, and content preflight.
No repository modifications were made as part of the preflight.
The full source-side comparison established:
e5c8f0c3ebece99954dbbe0ee87d35d19555efbeThe connector did not expose the complete 18-commit history in a single response, so this description does not claim that every individual commit was manually reviewed.
Governance
This proposal does not request or imply merge authorization.
Merge remains entirely subject to:
No upstream
microsoft/AIOpsLabchange is requested by this PR.No permission bypass is requested.
Maintainer review requested
Please review the proposed integration for:
vitrixlab/;vitrixLab/AIOpsLabdevelopment line;