Migrate simple repository API specifications from PEPs - #1477
Merged
Conversation
chrysle
reviewed
Jan 4, 2024
EpicWink
force-pushed
the
simple-repo-api-pep-migrate
branch
2 times, most recently
from
January 5, 2024 01:05
15f6050 to
e875393
Compare
Contributor
|
LGTM. Could you rebase and fix the linkcheck? |
Contributor
Author
EpicWink
force-pushed
the
simple-repo-api-pep-migrate
branch
from
January 16, 2024 02:22
e875393 to
e98be74
Compare
EpicWink
force-pushed
the
simple-repo-api-pep-migrate
branch
from
January 16, 2024 02:24
e98be74 to
0ad7a84
Compare
chrysle
approved these changes
Jan 16, 2024
Contributor
|
Thanks! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A potential precursor to #1442, simply copying the specifications from the relevant PEPs and replacing PEP references with internal links. Specs are otherwise unchanged (eg dist-info-metadata field is not renamed in the original spec; this could be a future PR, or changed here if requested).
The spec history is also converted to a list to be consistent with other specs.
Solves part of #1093
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://python-packaging-user-guide--1477.org.readthedocs.build/en/1477/