Merged
Conversation
…yntax highlighting
…e block for syntax highlighting
…e block for syntax highlighting
moisedk
commented
Jan 17, 2025
Contributor
Author
moisedk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I indented the code to make it more readable, and this makes it look there was a lot of changes.
pearcej
approved these changes
Jan 17, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I removed the replit references and replaced them with the code block when there is a reference to it (6.4)
The other replit links no longer have the source code, so I simply deleted them since there is no reference to them in the section.
Related Issue
#242
How Has This Been Tested?
Built and tested in the browser.