Skip to content

Conversation

@timmc
Copy link
Contributor

@timmc timmc commented Apr 25, 2021

The relationship of the old and new specs was not entirely clear, and the
spec versions did not have names to refer to them by; implementors can now
indicate which version they support, if needed.

This commit establishes the year of release as the version name, makes
it clear that the 2013 version is the current and stable one, and hints
that support for the 2011 version is not necessary in new implementations.

(Also includes some minor language clarifications.)

The relationship of the old and new specs was not entirely clear, and the
spec versions did not have names to refer to them by; implementors can now
indicate which version they support, if needed.

This commit establishes the year of release as the version name, makes
it clear that the 2013 version is the current and stable one, and hints
that support for the 2011 version is not necessary in new implementations.

(Also includes some minor language clarifications.)
@timmc
Copy link
Contributor Author

timmc commented Dec 29, 2021

@frsyuki Would it be possible to get some feedback on this PR? I think making this clarification would be very helpful to others considering using this format.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant