fix(RAG): Better error handling for missing RAG db or model in chat - #3048
fix(RAG): Better error handling for missing RAG db or model in chat#3048jwm4 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Addressed review comment and I finally tracked down the correct issue to attach this PR too so I updated the description too. |
|
@RobotSail Can you re-review? I believe I have addressed the main substance of your concern, but I wound up taking it a different direction than the one you had recommended. |
|
Added |
36b54ff to
4f7fbfd
Compare
|
This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be merged. @jwm4 please rebase it. https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork |
Signed-off-by: Bill Murdock <bmurdock@redhat.com>
4f7fbfd to
68a5af3
Compare
|
This PR has become severely entangled with merge conflicts due to multiple rounds of squashing and rebasing (and probably a fair amount of user error on my part). I am closing it for now. If we decide that it is a priority, I will start over with the updates to the chat code in a new PR on a new branch. |
Issue resolved by this Pull Request:
Resolves #2973
Checklist:
conventional commits.