Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 23, 2026. It is now read-only.

[DRAFT] Model serve multiple backends - #1386

Closed
alimaredia wants to merge 4 commits into
instructlab:mainfrom
alimaredia:model-serve-multiple-backends
Closed

[DRAFT] Model serve multiple backends#1386
alimaredia wants to merge 4 commits into
instructlab:mainfrom
alimaredia:model-serve-multiple-backends

Conversation

@alimaredia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Checklist:

  • Commit Message Formatting: Commit titles and messages follow guidelines in the
    conventional commits.
  • Changelog updated with breaking and/or notable changes for the next minor release.
  • Documentation has been updated, if necessary.
  • Unit tests have been added, if necessary.
  • Integration tests have been added, if necessary.

rewrite/copy ensure_serve logic to work
with a model served with vllm for `ilab chat`

Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
@mergify mergify Bot added the ci-failure PR has at least one CI failure label Jun 17, 2024
@tiran

tiran commented Jun 17, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The vLLM package on PyPI is a CUDA build. How do you plan to support CPU-only, ROCm, and the vLLM fork for Intel Gaudi?

@alimaredia alimaredia added the hold In-progress PR. Tag should be removed before merge. label Jun 17, 2024
@alimaredia

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@tiran I understand your concerns and your comments in #1276 were insightful and will be applied/taken into consideration. The requirements.txt in this file was able to work in my development environment, and is not intended to be merged.

This PR is purely a draft, @leseb will be taking over this integrating vllm into ilab. I just wanted a place where many people can get eyes on the code and discuss the feature.

@leseb
leseb marked this pull request as draft June 17, 2024 11:38
@mergify

mergify Bot commented Jun 18, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has merge conflicts that must be resolved before it can be
merged. @alimaredia please rebase it. https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/working-with-forks/syncing-a-fork

@mergify mergify Bot added the needs-rebase This Pull Request needs to be rebased label Jun 18, 2024
@leseb

leseb commented Jun 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing in favor of #1442. Thanks!

@leseb leseb closed this Jun 21, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

ci-failure PR has at least one CI failure hold In-progress PR. Tag should be removed before merge. needs-rebase This Pull Request needs to be rebased

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants