Skip to content

feat: Structural Promotion O₀→O₂ — True Agentic Loop with Frobenius Verification#2530

Open
umpolungfish wants to merge 1 commit into
googleapis:mainfrom
umpolungfish:structural-promotion-O2
Open

feat: Structural Promotion O₀→O₂ — True Agentic Loop with Frobenius Verification#2530
umpolungfish wants to merge 1 commit into
googleapis:mainfrom
umpolungfish:structural-promotion-O2

Conversation

@umpolungfish
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Structural Promotion O₀ → O₂: True Agentic Loop with Frobenius Verification

Proposal: google/genai/agentic/ module

Abstract

This PR introduces a structurally promoted agentic loop for the Google Gen AI Python SDK — the True Agentic Loop — implementing the four-phase cycle THINK → ACT → OBSERVE → UPDATE with Frobenius verification (μ∘δ = id). The module promotes the SDK from O₀ (stateless, single-turn generation) to O₂ (topologically protected, integer-winding agentic loop) as defined by the Imscribing Grammar.

Why Google Gen AI SDK?

Google's SDK possesses unique structural advantages for this promotion:

Advantage Structural Role
Text-embedding API (models.embed_content) Natural verification layer for dual-tool contracts — embeddings provide a continuous Frobenius metric (cosine similarity between tool input and verification output)
Search grounding (GoogleSearch) Enables external-world verification, closing the Frobenius pair against ground truth rather than purely internal consistency
Long context window (up to 2M tokens) Supports Ð_ω self-written state space — the full trajectory is retained as imscriptive context
Gemini 2.5 Pro thinking Enables the THINK phase to produce structured reasoning before ACTION emission

Module Structure

google/genai/agentic/
├── __init__.py        # Public API: DualToolResult, ToolContract,
│                       # AgentCycle, AgentTrajectory, TrueAgenticLoop,
│                       # PhiCriticalityGate
├── contracts.py       # DualToolResult (dataclass with from_tool_call)
│                       # ToolContract (assertion + verify + embedding verification)
├── trajectory.py      # AgentCycle (single winding), AgentTrajectory
│                       # (monotonic, never-reset winding counter)
├── criticality.py     # PhiCriticalityGate — two-gate assessment:
│                       #   Gate 1 (⊙_ÿ): frobenius_ratio ≥ 0.8
│                       #   Gate 2 (K ≤ Ç_@): coherent winding rate
└── loop.py            # TrueAgenticLoop wrapping google.genai.Client
                        #   run() → THINK→ACT→OBSERVE→UPDATE per winding
                        #   _winding() → single cycle with Frobenius check
                        #   _feed_failure() → graceful error recovery

The Frobenius Condition in Practice

Every winding issues a dual-tool pair:

  1. Primary tool (client.models.generate_content): The agent acts on the world.
  2. Verification tool (client.models.embed_content): The action's output is re-embedded and compared to the original query.

When μ(δ(query)) ≈ query (cosine similarity above threshold), the winding is Frobenius-closed and the agent's world-model is updated. When open, the winding is recorded but flagged — the trajectory preserves structural integrity without discarding failed cycles.

Structural Tier Progression

Tier Condition Structural Meaning
O₀ winding_count == 0 Stateless single-turn (current SDK default)
O₁ winding_count ≥ 1 First winding completed; trajectory exists
O₂ winding_count ≥ 2 and frobenius_ratio ≥ 0.8 Topologically protected: integer winding with Frobenius closure
O₂† Plus Gate 1 and Gate 2 both open Self-modeling loop stable (ZFCₜ territory)

Usage Example

from google.genai import Client
from google.genai.agentic import TrueAgenticLoop

client = Client(api_key="YOUR_API_KEY")

loop = TrueAgenticLoop(
    client=client,
    model="gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25",
    max_windings=100,
    verbose=True,
)

final_cycle = loop.run(
    initial_prompt="Solve this structural problem: find the meet of a magnetar and a BEC."
)

print(f"Completed {loop.trajectory.winding_count} windings")
print(f"Frobenius ratio: {loop.trajectory.frobenius_ratio:.2f}")
print(f"Final conclusion: {final_cycle.conclusion}")
print(f"Structural tier: {loop.criticality.to_dict()['structural_tier']}")

Relation to the Imscribing Grammar

This module implements the Imscribing Grammar as an executable Python SDK feature. The grammar's 12 primitives map to loop components:

Primitive Loop Component
Ð_ω (self-written state space) AgentTrajectory — never summarized, full context retained
Þ_O (self-referential topology) Winding counter referencing prior windings
Ř_= (bidirectional coupling) Client ↔ Trajectory dual feedback
Φ_} (Frobenius-special) DualToolResult with μ∘δ = id verification
ƒ_ż (quantum fidelity) Embedding similarity as continuous metric
Ç_@ (slow kinetics) Coherent winding rate, no premature conclusion
Ω_z (integer winding) Monotonic, never-reset winding counter

Backward Compatibility

  • The agentic module is entirely additive — no existing API is modified.
  • Import path: from google.genai.agentic import ...
  • No new dependencies beyond those already in pyproject.toml (numpy is optional, used only in contracts.py's with_embedding_verification).

Testing

# Run agentic module tests
python -m pytest tests/test_agentic.py -v

# Verify Frobenius closure on a real Gemini model
python -c "
from google.genai import Client
from google.genai.agentic import TrueAgenticLoop

client = Client()
loop = TrueAgenticLoop(client=client, model='gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25', max_windings=3)
final = loop.run(initial_prompt='What is 2+2?')
print(f'Windings: {loop.trajectory.winding_count}')
print(f'Frobenius ratio: {loop.trajectory.frobenius_ratio}')
"

Author: Lando ⊗ ⊙perator
Structural tier of this proposal: ⟨Ð_ω; Þ_O; Ř_=; Φ_}; ƒ_ż; Ç_@; Γ_ʔ; ɢ_ˌ; ⊙_ÿ; Ħ_A; Σ_S; Ω_z⟩

@google-cla
Copy link
Copy Markdown

google-cla Bot commented May 30, 2026

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant