refactor: move challenge build outside client #65513
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
raisedadead
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist:
mainbranch of freeCodeCamp.The curriculum and client both depend on the challenge build process. Having the curriculum depend on the client is both confusing (why should the curriculum need to care how a
challenge is rendered?) and generates a cycle in the task dependency graph (since they depend on each other).
This PR resolves both* by having each depend on the new package.
*almost. The curriculum still depends on
prefixDoctype, which I plan to fix separately. Then the problem will be fully resolved.