Revive PhaseEquilibrium::new_npt in the public interface#164
Merged
Conversation
g-bauer
approved these changes
Jul 7, 2023
| /// | ||
| /// The constructor can be used in custom phase equilibrium solvers or, | ||
| /// e.g., to generate initial guesses for an actual VLE solver. | ||
| /// In general, the two states generated are NOT in an equilibrium. |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To make this even more visible, we could add a header, i.e.
/// # Note
///
/// In general, the two states generated are NOT in an equilibrium.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently there is no way to create a
PhaseEquilibriumobject without calling any of the solvers. Some solvers (e.g., the tp flash), however, use aPhaseEquilibriumas initialization. Therefore thenew_nptfunction can be used to create custom initial guesses. Currently the docstring informs the users that the result is not a phase equilibrium, but I would not be surprised if someone uses the function with the assumption that it is a (much faster and better converging) tp flash.