Skip to content

Fix regression in release workflow - #990

Merged
Timofei Larkin (lllamnyp) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hotfix/workflows
May 26, 2025
Merged

Fix regression in release workflow#990
Timofei Larkin (lllamnyp) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hotfix/workflows

Conversation

@lllamnyp

@lllamnyp Timofei Larkin (lllamnyp) commented May 26, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal configuration to use the full reference path for branch updates, ensuring alignment with Git conventions. No impact on user-facing features.

@lllamnyp
Fix regression in release workflow
bc294a0 
Signed-off-by: Timofei Larkin <lllamnyp@gmail.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

The update modifies the GitHub Actions workflow by changing the branch reference in the github.rest.git.updateRef call from heads/${branch} to refs/heads/${branch}. This adjustment ensures the reference follows the correct Git naming convention, but does not alter the workflow's logic or exported entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/pull-requests-release.yaml Updated branch reference string to use full refs/heads/ prefix in updateRef call.

Poem

In the warren of code, a path was made clear,
"refs/heads/" now leads, so the branch is near.
No logic was shifted, no function was bent,
Just a tidy-up hop, on naming intent.
🐇✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bf5bccb and bc294a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/pull-requests-release.yaml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build and Test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-requests-release.yaml (1)

110-116: Use fully-qualified Git ref in updateRef call
The github.rest.git.updateRef invocation now correctly specifies refs/heads/${branch} (rather than heads/${branch}), which matches the GitHub REST API’s requirement for a fully qualified reference path.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lllamnyp
Timofei Larkin (lllamnyp) deleted the hotfix/workflows branch May 26, 2025 11:32
@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot mentioned this pull request May 26, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@kvaps Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) Awaiting requested review from kvaps kvaps is a code owner
@klinch0 klinch0 Awaiting requested review from klinch0

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@lllamnyp