Skip to content

Upd: Maintainers - #565

Closed
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
maintainers
Closed

Upd: Maintainers#565
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
maintainers

Conversation

@kvaps

@kvaps Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai Bot
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated maintainers documentation with a new "Scope" column
    • Added several new maintainers with their specific project responsibilities

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the size/S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files label Jan 9, 2025
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jan 9, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the MAINTAINERS.md file by introducing a new "Scope" column to provide more clarity about maintainers' specific responsibilities within the Cozystack project. The changes expand the existing maintainer table to include six new maintainers, each associated with distinct areas such as Cozystack apps, Flux and flux-operator, and documentation. This modification offers a more detailed view of the project's leadership and expertise distribution.

Changes

File Change Summary
MAINTAINERS.md - Added "Scope" column to maintainers table
- Introduced new maintainers: Kirill Klinchenkov, Kingdon Barrett, Timur Tukaev, Andrey Gumilev, Timofey Larkin, and Artem Bortnikov
- Specified maintainer roles and responsibilities

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, maintainers rise,
With scopes defined and skills so wise
Cozystack's guardians, clear and bright
Bringing order with each insight
A team united, roles precise! 🛠️

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation label Jan 9, 2025
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai Bot reviewed Jan 9, 2025
View reviewed changes

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
MAINTAINERS.md (1)

3-12: Well-structured maintainer documentation

The new table structure with scope definition provides better clarity about areas of responsibility. This organization will help both contributors and users better understand who to contact for specific aspects of the project.

Consider adding a brief description of what each scope entails, either as a separate section or as footnotes, to provide more context about the areas of responsibility.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 227848a and 324b09c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • MAINTAINERS.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
MAINTAINERS.md (4)

3-4: LGTM! Well-structured table header

The table structure follows Markdown best practices with clear column headers.

5-6: LGTM! Clear designation of core maintainers

Core maintainers are well-documented with proper GitHub profile links.

11-11: Verify company information

The company field is empty for Timofey Larkin. Please verify if this is intentional or if it should be updated.

7-12: LGTM! Well-organized maintainer responsibilities

The addition of specific scopes provides clear accountability and shows good distribution of responsibilities across the team. Having multiple maintainers for documentation and etcd-operator demonstrates good redundancy in critical areas.

tym83
Timur Tukaev (tym83) approved these changes Jan 9, 2025
View reviewed changes

@tym83 Timur Tukaev (tym83) left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jan 9, 2025
@kvaps

Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) commented Jan 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Closed in favor #564

myasnikovdaniil added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2026
@myasnikovdaniil
docs: expand v1.5.0 changelog with platform-component and upgrade detail
62646bf 
Merge the AI-generated v1.5.0 changelog with a fuller pass:

- Add an "Upgrade Notes and Required Actions" section (K8s 1.33+, removal
  of upgrade.force, GPU permittedHostDevices ownership, MetalLB FRR-K8s /
  HTTPS metrics, automatic TLS on externally-published services).
- Expand "Platform Components" with per-component upstream highlights and
  CVE references (Flux v2.8 CVE-2026-23990, MetalLB v0.16 CVE-2025-22874),
  plus the new frr-k8s subchart and kuberture package.
- Scope the storageClass-immutability entry (#2639) to UI-only enforcement,
  with apiserver enforcement tracked in #2657.
- Broaden Development/Testing/CI coverage and add the v1.4.x website docs
  backports (#565, #566, #567, #580).
- Correct the loop-device LVM-filter attribution to talm#215 (the prior
  ansible-cozystack#51 reference was a dependency bump, not this change).

Signed-off-by: Myasnikov Daniil <myasnikovdaniil2001@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments
@tym83 Timur Tukaev (tym83) tym83 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size/S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@kvaps @tym83