Skip to content

[talos] Update Talos Linux v1.10.5 - #1186

Merged
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
talos-upd
Jul 10, 2025
Merged

[talos] Update Talos Linux v1.10.5#1186
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
talos-upd

Conversation

@kvaps

@kvaps Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil kvapss@gmail.com

What this PR does

Release note

[talos] Update Talos Linux v1.10.5

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated system firmware, microcode, and storage extension versions to the latest releases across all installer profiles.
    • Increased profile version from v1.10.3 to v1.10.5 for improved component compatibility and reliability.
    • Made installer image versioning dynamic to align with the latest Talos version automatically.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This change updates the Talos Linux installer profile YAML files across multiple profiles, incrementing their version from v1.10.3 to v1.10.5. All system extension image references—including firmware, microcode, DRBD, and ZFS—are updated to newer versions or more recent date-based tags. No structural or configuration logic changes are made.

Changes

Files (grouped) Change Summary
packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/initramfs.yaml
.../installer.yaml
.../iso.yaml
.../kernel.yaml
.../metal.yaml
.../nocloud.yaml
Updated profile version from v1.10.3 to v1.10.5; refreshed all systemExtensions image references (firmware, microcode, drbd, zfs) to newer patch versions or more recent date tags. No other configuration or structure changes.
packages/core/installer/hack/gen-profiles.sh Modified script to dynamically set the baseInstaller image reference version using ${TALOS_VERSION} instead of a hardcoded v1.10.3 tag.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TalosInstaller
    participant Registry

    User->>TalosInstaller: Deploy with profile (v1.10.5)
    TalosInstaller->>Registry: Pull baseInstaller:v1.10.5
    TalosInstaller->>Registry: Pull updated firmware/microcode images (202507xx)
    TalosInstaller->>Registry: Pull drbd:9.2.14-v1.10.5
    TalosInstaller->>Registry: Pull zfs:2.3.3-v1.10.5
    TalosInstaller-->>User: Complete installation with updated components
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size:M

Suggested reviewers

  • lllamnyp
  • klinch0

Poem

The YAMLs hop from three to five,
With firmware fresh and tags alive.
DRBD and ZFS, now up to date,
The profiles gleam—oh, they look great!
A bunny cheers with every patch,
For smooth installs that always match.
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e6e7a7 and aa84b1c.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • packages/core/installer/hack/gen-profiles.sh (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/initramfs.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/installer.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/iso.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/kernel.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/metal.yaml (1 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/nocloud.yaml (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/iso.yaml (1)

6-14: Base installer is still on v1.10.3 → very likely a mismatch with the profile version bump

The profile explicitly advertises version: v1.10.5, yet the baseInstaller.imageRef remains pinned to v1.10.3. Deployments will therefore mix a newer profile with an older installer binary, which is a frequent source of subtle breakage (extension-API drift, unsupported kernel params, etc.).

If v1.10.5 is the target release, keep all Talos artefacts on the same minor/patch version to guarantee compatibility.

-    imageRef: "ghcr.io/siderolabs/installer:v1.10.3"
+    imageRef: "ghcr.io/siderolabs/installer:v1.10.5"
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/iso.yaml (1)

15-21: Tag-only references: consider pinning digests for reproducibility

All updated systemExtensions use floating date / patch tags (20250708, v1.10.5, etc.).
For long-term reproducibility (and to avoid unexpected image mutations), pin each reference to an immutable digest (@sha256:…).

This is optional for day-to-day CI but highly recommended for release branches or downstream artefact builders.

packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/nocloud.yaml (1)

15-21: Pin system-extension images by digest (and verify mixed microcode dates)

  1. All extension tags are mutable (e.g., 20250708). For fully reproducible builds, consider pinning by digest (@sha256:…) instead of tags to avoid unexpected drift.

  2. Most firmware images were updated to 20250708, yet intel-ucode remains at 20250512. Confirm this is deliberate and not an accidental omission.

These are low-risk but worthwhile hygiene tweaks for long-term determinism.

packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/metal.yaml (1)

15-21: Pin images by digest for reproducible builds

All new system-extension references are mutable tags (date-based or semver). To guarantee bit-for-bit reproducibility and prevent supply-chain surprises, consider switching to digest-pinned refs, e.g.:

- imageRef: ghcr.io/siderolabs/amd-ucode:20250708
+ imageRef: ghcr.io/siderolabs/amd-ucode@sha256:<digest>

The same applies to the remaining entries.

packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/installer.yaml (1)

15-21: Confirm digest-pinning & consistency of firmware dates
All firmware/system-extension tags were rolled forward, but:

  1. intel-ucode lags at 20250512 while others moved to 20250708 – check if a newer microcode blob exists to keep the set in lock-step.
  2. Tags alone are mutable. For reproducible builds, consider pinning by digest (sha256:…) rather than date/semantic tags.

No functional blocker, but tightening these helps long-term traceability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 32aea42 and 7e6e7a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/initramfs.yaml (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/installer.yaml (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/iso.yaml (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/kernel.yaml (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/metal.yaml (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/nocloud.yaml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build
🔇 Additional comments (6)
packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/nocloud.yaml (1)

6-14: Version bump to v1.10.5 while baseInstaller.imageRef remains on v1.10.3

The profile declares version: v1.10.5, but the baseInstaller still pulls ghcr.io/siderolabs/installer:v1.10.3.
If the v1.10.5 release contains critical fixes, security patches, or schema changes, shipping an older installer container could lead to subtle incompatibilities at install time.

Please double-check whether this mismatch is intentional and, if not, update the image reference:

-    imageRef: "ghcr.io/siderolabs/installer:v1.10.3"
+    imageRef: "ghcr.io/siderolabs/installer:v1.10.5"
packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/kernel.yaml (2)

12-13: Base installer tag is still v1.10.3 while profile is v1.10.5 – double-check this isn’t an oversight.
If the installer:v1.10.5 image exists, it should probably be referenced here for consistency; if it doesn’t, please confirm that mixing versions is expected and supported by Talos.


15-21: Validate that every new system-extension image tag has been pushed and is pullable.
A quick pre-merge pull test (or CI job) will avoid runtime failures when the profile is consumed.

packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/metal.yaml (1)

6-14: Version skew between version field and baseInstaller tag

Profile advertises Talos v1.10.5, but the baseInstaller image is still pinned to v1.10.3. If this is unintentional it can cause subtle breakage (extension ABI drift, installer CLI flag mismatch, etc.).
Please double-check upstream release notes and either bump the installer tag to v1.10.5 or add an explicit comment explaining why the older installer must be kept.

packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/initramfs.yaml (2)

15-21: Mixed-dated system-extension tags – double-check Intel ucode lag

All extensions were refreshed to the 2025-07-08 build except intel-ucode, which stayed on 2025-05-12.
If a newer microcode bundle exists, bumping it keeps the fleet homogeneous; otherwise a short comment noting the gap would prevent future confusion.


6-15: Verify Talos profile baseInstaller version alignment

All Talos profiles currently pin the baseInstaller image to ghcr.io/siderolabs/installer:v1.10.3, while initramfs.yaml (and presumably others) declare version: v1.10.5:

  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/nocloud.yaml: imageRef: installer:v1.10.3
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/kernel.yaml: imageRef: installer:v1.10.3
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/metal.yaml: imageRef: installer:v1.10.3
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/iso.yaml: imageRef: installer:v1.10.3
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/installer.yaml: imageRef: installer:v1.10.3
  • packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/initramfs.yaml: imageRef: installer:v1.10.3

Please confirm whether this discrepancy is intentional (e.g., compatibility constraints noted in release notes or upstream changelog) or update each imageRef to installer:v1.10.5 to match the declared version.

Comment thread packages/core/installer/images/talos/profiles/installer.yaml
Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
@kvaps
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) merged commit 1b7a597 into main Jul 10, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@kvaps
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) deleted the talos-upd branch July 10, 2025 12:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant