-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 110
fix: Task.artifacts and Task.history null deserialization (fixes #257) #258
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Task.artifacts and Task.history null deserialization (fixes #257) #258
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Niravkumar-Patel, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a deserialization issue in the Task class where artifacts and history fields could be null after JSON parsing, leading to potential NullPointerExceptions. The fix ensures these fields are always initialized to empty lists if not provided or explicitly null in the incoming data, thereby improving the robustness and type safety of the Task object.
Highlights
- Null Deserialization Fix: The Task class constructor now explicitly initializes artifacts and history fields to empty lists if they are null during deserialization, preventing NullPointerExceptions.
- Improved Type Safety: Ensures that optional array fields (artifacts and history) always maintain a non-null list type, aligning with A2A specification requirements for type safety.
- Comprehensive Unit Tests: New unit tests have been added to validate the deserialization behavior for Task objects, covering scenarios where artifacts and history fields are missing, explicitly null, or properly populated in the JSON input.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully addresses the null deserialization issue for Task.artifacts and Task.history by initializing them to empty lists when they are null. The addition of TaskDeserializationTest.java provides good test coverage for this fix, including cases with missing fields, explicit nulls, and populated arrays. My review includes a suggestion to further improve the immutability of the Task class by making defensive copies of the lists in the constructor, which would prevent potential side effects from mutable lists being passed in.
e077103 to
c8aed80
Compare
…oject#257) - Initialize artifacts and history fields with empty lists when null - Update javadoc to clarify null-safety guarantees - Add comprehensive unit tests for deserialization scenarios - Ensures type safety for optional array fields per A2A specification Fixes a2aproject#257
c8aed80 to
ec2a284
Compare
…roject#257) (a2aproject#258) # Description - Initialize artifacts and history fields with empty lists when null - Add comprehensive unit tests for deserialization scenarios - Ensures type safety for optional array fields per A2A specification Fixes a2aproject#257 Co-authored-by: nirav patel <nrv@Mac.attlocal.net>
Description
Fixes #257