Skip to content

Make static CI a matrix#16397

Merged
TravisEz13 merged 5 commits intoPowerShell:masterfrom
TravisEz13:make-static-matrix
Nov 9, 2021
Merged

Make static CI a matrix#16397
TravisEz13 merged 5 commits intoPowerShell:masterfrom
TravisEz13:make-static-matrix

Conversation

@TravisEz13
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 commented Nov 8, 2021

PR Summary

Make Static CI a matrix

PR Context

This allows finer grained units to be retried.

PR Checklist

@ghost ghost assigned daxian-dbw Nov 8, 2021
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 force-pushed the make-static-matrix branch 2 times, most recently from 940a487 to 94387b9 Compare November 8, 2021 17:42
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 changed the title Make static matrix Make static CI a matrix Nov 8, 2021
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2021 18:46
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This PR has 228 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Large
Size       : +167 -61
Percentile : 62.8%

Total files changed: 5

Change summary by file extension:
.yml : +160 -60
.ps1 : +7 -1

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Comment thread .vsts-ci/misc-analysis.yml Outdated
Comment thread .vsts-ci/misc-analysis.yml Outdated
@PaulHigin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@TravisEz13 Note that I have already approved the PR. I just some random questions.

@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 merged commit d176853 into PowerShell:master Nov 9, 2021
@TravisEz13 TravisEz13 deleted the make-static-matrix branch November 9, 2021 17:23
@anmenaga anmenaga added the CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log label Dec 13, 2021
@ghost
Copy link
Copy Markdown

ghost commented Dec 16, 2021

🎉v7.3.0-preview.1 has been released which incorporates this pull request.:tada:

Handy links:

TrapGodBrim pushed a commit to TrapGodBrim/PowerShell that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2022
* move markdown lint tests

* move markdown link tests

* refactor static link analysis into a matrix

* cache yarn packages

* fix paramater name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CL-BuildPackaging Indicates that a PR should be marked as a build or packaging change in the Change Log Large

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants