Update README.md to specify gathered telemetry#16379
Update README.md to specify gathered telemetry#16379daxian-dbw merged 9 commits intoPowerShell:masterfrom
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't it more accurate that if it's anything other than 1,yes, or true then it defaults to false meaning to send telemetry?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it would be great to make these links to the source code where we collect this information
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@SteveL-MSFT - this could be problematic if the code changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
make that a link instead of text to the source line
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - The name of a module when loaded if it is in the pre-approved list of modules (see line 128 in src/System.Management.Automation/utils/Telemetry.cs). | |
| - The name of a module when loaded if it is in the pre-approved [list of modules](https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell/blob/d74c6bfb7bc2ff84ae15cceeba2fb7dc5c3ccd17/src/System.Management.Automation/utils/Telemetry.cs#L128) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it is not best practice to include this line number perma-link then feel free to ignore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does the guid representing the session get generated for every session? or are those 2 using the same guid?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - The value of the environment variable `POWERSHELL_DISTRIBUTION_CHANNEL` | |
| - The value of the environment variable `POWERSHELL_DISTRIBUTION_CHANNEL`, if available |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just out of curiosity, how useful do we think it is to collect the command type information?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@JamesWTruher can you please comment on this question? I'm just curious how useful this information turns out to be in our telemetry analysis so far.
|
Pointing to the topic doc is surely better. |
|
@JamesWTruher please fix up the spelling issue, which caused the 'static-analysis' CI failed. |
daxian-dbw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
'static-analysis' CI failed, need to fix the spelling issue.
Co-authored-by: Steve Lee <slee@microsoft.com>
Co-authored-by: Steve Lee <slee@microsoft.com>
b8c6be1 to
aaddade
Compare
|
This PR has Quantification details
Why proper sizing of changes matters
Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
What can I do to optimize my changes
How to interpret the change counts in git diff output
Was this comment helpful? 👍 :ok_hand: :thumbsdown: (Email) |
|
I updated the CI yamls so future PRs to readme and spelling shouldn't trigger product tests, but because the PR now touches those files, we need to run those pipelines to validate those changes. |
sdwheeler
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look good to me.
|
🎉 Handy links: |
PR Summary
The telemetry statement in the README seems out of date.
PR Context
The telemetry statement should fully describe the data we gather.
PR Checklist
.h,.cpp,.cs,.ps1and.psm1files have the correct copyright headerWIP:or[ WIP ]to the beginning of the title (theWIPbot will keep its status check atPendingwhile the prefix is present) and remove the prefix when the PR is ready.(which runs in a different PS Host).