[GSoC Patch] t2000: modernize path checks to use helper functions#2256
[GSoC Patch] t2000: modernize path checks to use helper functions#2256alibaba0010 wants to merge 1 commit intogit:masterfrom
Conversation
Welcome to GitGitGadgetHi @alibaba0010, and welcome to GitGitGadget, the GitHub App to send patch series to the Git mailing list from GitHub Pull Requests. Please make sure that either:
You can CC potential reviewers by adding a footer to the PR description with the following syntax: NOTE: DO NOT copy/paste your CC list from a previous GGG PR's description, Also, it is a good idea to review the commit messages one last time, as the Git project expects them in a quite specific form:
It is in general a good idea to await the automated test ("Checks") in this Pull Request before contributing the patches, e.g. to avoid trivial issues such as unportable code. Contributing the patchesBefore you can contribute the patches, your GitHub username needs to be added to the list of permitted users. Any already-permitted user can do that, by adding a comment to your PR of the form Both the person who commented An alternative is the channel Once on the list of permitted usernames, you can contribute the patches to the Git mailing list by adding a PR comment If you want to see what email(s) would be sent for a After you submit, GitGitGadget will respond with another comment that contains the link to the cover letter mail in the Git mailing list archive. Please make sure to monitor the discussion in that thread and to address comments and suggestions (while the comments and suggestions will be mirrored into the PR by GitGitGadget, you will still want to reply via mail). If you do not want to subscribe to the Git mailing list just to be able to respond to a mail, you can download the mbox from the Git mailing list archive (click the curl -g --user "<EMailAddress>:<Password>" \
--url "imaps://imap.gmail.com/INBOX" -T /path/to/raw.txtTo iterate on your change, i.e. send a revised patch or patch series, you will first want to (force-)push to the same branch. You probably also want to modify your Pull Request description (or title). It is a good idea to summarize the revision by adding something like this to the cover letter (read: by editing the first comment on the PR, i.e. the PR description): To send a new iteration, just add another PR comment with the contents: Need help?New contributors who want advice are encouraged to join git-mentoring@googlegroups.com, where volunteers who regularly contribute to Git are willing to answer newbie questions, give advice, or otherwise provide mentoring to interested contributors. You must join in order to post or view messages, but anyone can join. You may also be able to find help in real time in the developer IRC channel, |
5f612a9 to
5f7cfe7
Compare
|
Invalid author email in 04b1502: "99949368+alibaba0010@users.noreply.github.com" |
|
There is a merge commit in this Pull Request: Please rebase the branch and force-push. |
04b1502 to
261ebbc
Compare
ahmedoosh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
alibaba0010:modernize-test-path-checking
| 'test ! -h path2 && test -d path2 && | ||
| test ! -h path3 && test -d path3 && | ||
| test ! -h path2/file0 && test -f path2/file0 && | ||
| test ! -h path3/file1 && test -f path3/file1' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I agree with the advice given. However I want some more eyes on thi
|
@wattsonsean8-del i don't get what you meant by "some more eyes on this" |
261ebbc to
de6fb2c
Compare
|
Invalid author email in db649ab: "99949368+alibaba0010@users.noreply.github.com" |
|
There is a merge commit in this Pull Request: Please rebase the branch and force-push. |
db649ab to
b6680f4
Compare
That's most likely AI slop. Sadly, the Git maintainer seems uninterested to keep this here repository clean of spam. |
Now that the test script has been modernised, consolidate the eight separate test_expect_success blocks that together form the second test scenario (setup, tree writes, checkout, symlink creation, and final state check) into one self-contained block. This makes it easier to read: data set-up, the operations being tested, and the expected outcome are now all in one place. Helped-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Zakariyah Ali <zakariyahali100@gmail.com>
b6680f4 to
4da2092
Compare
This is my GSoC microproject submission modernizing test path checks in t/t2000-conflict-when-checking-files-out.sh.
Replace old-style path checks using test -f, test -d, and test ! -h with dedicated test helper functions for improved test clarity and consistency.
This modernization improves test script readability by using Git's dedicated test helpers:
test -f → test_path_is_file
test -d → test_path_is_dir
test ! -h && test -f → test_path_is_file_not_symlink
test ! -h && test -d → test_path_is_dir_not_symlink
Found instances using: git grep 'test -[efd]' t/ | grep 'test -[efd].*&&'
Converted 5 instances in t/t2000-conflict-when-checking-files-out.sh
This improves test clarity and consistency across the test suite.
I'm excited to contribute to Git and look forward to your feedback!
CC: Christian Couder christian.couder@gmail.com
CC: Karthik Nayak karthik.188@gmail.com
CC: Justin Tobler jltobler@gmail.com
CC: Siddharth Asthana siddharthasthana31@gmail.com
CC: Ayush Chandekar ayu.chandekar@gmail.com