Conversation
rkoster
requested review from
beyhan,
itsouvalas and
wayneeseguin
as code owners
September 19, 2026 17:06
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #64
What is this note about?
A research note on Docker Sandboxes as local microVM isolation for coding agents. It distinguishes its local
sbx-managed harness model from a remote, multi-tenant sandbox execution API, and compares that boundary with OpenSandbox lifecycle and execution APIs. It covers workspace modes, Docker isolation, network and credential mediation, MCP policy, and Cloud Foundry relevance.Checklist
research/and uses a lowercase kebab-case filename.research/TEMPLATE.mdand has valid frontmatter.