Switch-up strategy for ensuring dynamic vars end up in LSP#151
Merged
tychedelia merged 2 commits intoprocessing:mainfrom Apr 28, 2026
Merged
Switch-up strategy for ensuring dynamic vars end up in LSP#151tychedelia merged 2 commits intoprocessing:mainfrom
tychedelia merged 2 commits intoprocessing:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Our original goal was to support both:
Unfortunately, for stub generation and for LSP support, this is problematic as there isn't a good way to have an item that is both a variable and/or a function.
This PR changes our strategy -- everything is a variable/attribute. Having "magic" attr getters on a module seems to be a bit less Pythonic, but after all that's what properties are so it's fine, I think.