bpo-32260: don't byte swap siphash keys#4771
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Reference siphash takes the keys as a bytes, so it makes sense to byte swap when reifying the keys as 64-bit integers. However, Python's siphash takes host integers in to start with.
Contributor
Author
|
@tiran, I'm going merge this because I hope it will fix the big endian buildboxes. |
Member
|
@benjaminp Was it a success? |
Contributor
Author
|
Almost. The core hash algorithm is now consistent across endianness but since we need to byte swap PYTHONHASHSEED for true consistency. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference siphash takes the keys as a bytes, so it makes sense to byte swap
when reifying the keys as 64-bit integers. However, Python's siphash takes host
integers in to start with.
https://bugs.python.org/issue32260