Reference: pure-c/purec#34 (comment)
Exposing Char as UTF-16 code units is problematic for backends that need to use something other than UTF-16 as the underlying representation. Would it be better if Char was encoding agnostic and represented a code point? What would that mean for purescript-strings?
Reference: pure-c/purec#34 (comment)
Exposing
Charas UTF-16 code units is problematic for backends that need to use something other than UTF-16 as the underlying representation. Would it be better ifCharwas encoding agnostic and represented a code point? What would that mean forpurescript-strings?