Code of Conduct
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
https://docs.github.com/en/account-and-profile/setting-up-and-managing-your-personal-account-on-github/managing-email-preferences/setting-your-commit-email-address
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
Consider this data reusables.user-settings.no-verification-disposable-emails note.
The statement "If you'd like to keep your email address private, you can use a GitHub-provided noreply email address" is repeated directly after the Note.

Furthermore, within the Note, the "Setting your commit email address" link has the same title as the article itself, which is confusingly self-referential. Also, the link actually points to a heading that appears just after the Note, rather than the top of the article as one would expect from the link title.
Perhaps this reusable note should be replaced with a sentence that conveys the same information without repetition. Reduction in repetition increases clarity, especially for a novice reader.
Additional information
No response
Code of Conduct
What article on docs.github.com is affected?
https://docs.github.com/en/account-and-profile/setting-up-and-managing-your-personal-account-on-github/managing-email-preferences/setting-your-commit-email-address
What part(s) of the article would you like to see updated?
Consider this
data reusables.user-settings.no-verification-disposable-emailsnote.The statement "If you'd like to keep your email address private, you can use a GitHub-provided noreply email address" is repeated directly after the Note.
Furthermore, within the Note, the "Setting your commit email address" link has the same title as the article itself, which is confusingly self-referential. Also, the link actually points to a heading that appears just after the Note, rather than the top of the article as one would expect from the link title.
Perhaps this reusable note should be replaced with a sentence that conveys the same information without repetition. Reduction in repetition increases clarity, especially for a novice reader.
Additional information
No response