While installing utPLSQL v3.1.10 on a customer's development database recently, we were asked by the customer's DBA team if utPLSQL is using any licensed Oracle database features such as Diagnostics pack / Tuning pack. They saw that it is using DBMS_PROFILER and wondered what else it might be doing. I know that utPLSQL is not using Diagnostics pack / Tuning pack and that it uses DBMS_PROFILER for code coverage. I responded to them with that information.
Would it be worth stating some of this in the utPLSQL documentation? e.g. on the install.html page of the documentation, explicitly state that utPLSQL does not have any dependency on costed database options such as Diagnostics pack / Tuning pack / Partitioning etc.
While installing utPLSQL v3.1.10 on a customer's development database recently, we were asked by the customer's DBA team if utPLSQL is using any licensed Oracle database features such as Diagnostics pack / Tuning pack. They saw that it is using DBMS_PROFILER and wondered what else it might be doing. I know that utPLSQL is not using Diagnostics pack / Tuning pack and that it uses DBMS_PROFILER for code coverage. I responded to them with that information.
Would it be worth stating some of this in the utPLSQL documentation? e.g. on the install.html page of the documentation, explicitly state that utPLSQL does not have any dependency on costed database options such as Diagnostics pack / Tuning pack / Partitioning etc.