cpplearner
diff --git a/‎docs/cpp-conformance-improvements-2017.md‎
Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion b/‎docs/cpp-conformance-improvements-2017.md‎
Lines changed: 2 additions & 1 deletion
@@ -671,7 +671,6 @@ void g()
 ```
 
 To fix the problem, either change the **f(S)** signature or remove it.
-Note that the warning is off-by-default and only affects code compiled with  /Wall or /WX.
 
 ### C5038: order of initialization in initializer lists
 Class members are initialized in the order they are declared, not the order they appear in initializer lists. Previous versions of the compiler did not warn when the order of the initializer list differed from the order of declaration. This could lead to undefined runtime behavior if the intialization of one member depended on another member in the list already being initialized. In the following example, Visual Studio 2017 Update Version 15.3 (with /Wall or /WX) raises warning C5038: data member 'A::y' will be initialized after data member 'A::x':
@@ -687,5 +686,7 @@ struct A
 ```
 To fix the problem arrange the intializer list to have the same order as the declarations. A similar warning is raised when one or both initializers refer to base class members.
 
+Note that the warning is off-by-default and only affects code compiled with  /Wall or /WX.
+
 ## See Also  
 [Visual C++ Language Conformance](visual-cpp-language-conformance.md)