@@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ Patsy is a good houseguest:
1616* Pure Python, no compilation necessary.
1717* Exhaustive tests (>98% statement coverage at time of writing) and
1818 documentation (you're looking at it).
19- * No dependencies besides numpy (and we even test against numpy 1.2.1,
20- as distributed by RHEL 5).
21- * Tested and supported on every version of Python since 2.4.
19+ * No dependencies besides numpy.
20+ * Tested and supported on every version of Python since 2.5. (And 2.4
21+ probably still works too if you really want it, it's just become too
22+ hard to keep a working 2.4 environment on the test server.)
2223
2324So you can be pretty confident that adding a dependency on Patsy
2425won't create much hassle for your users.
@@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ it's quite straightforward to add custom operators to the formula
162163parser, or otherwise extend the formula evaluation machinery. (Heck,
163164it only took an hour or two to repurpose it for a totally different
164165purpose, parsing linear constraints.) But extending Patsy in a
165- more fundamental way this will require just a wee bit more complicated
166+ more fundamental way then this will require just a wee bit more complicated
166167API than just calling :func: `dmatrices `, and for this initial release,
167168we've been busy enough getting the basics working that we haven't yet
168169taken the time to pin down a public extension API we can support.
0 commit comments